That tweet is wholly unacceptable and wishes to be removed. I’d motivate someone to also put up an apology tweet.
Given the scale, attain, and influence of Stack Overflow, I’d hope that the firm would withhold itself to high ethical requirements. A tweet esteem this, taken without ample context, can motive hurt to the recognition of the Wikimedia Basis and is a transparent misrepresentation of the work that the group does. It actively harms the customary public’s belief of computing-associated points, namely as this spreads thru folk that “favorite” or retweet this, namely if folk that would no longer know better flee with the textual stutter material.
I would ask SE to be better than clickbaity titles than that.
You’re going to never wager what occurs subsequent!
Thanks for bringing this roar to our consideration. I’m the director of stutter material advertising and marketing and marketing at Stack Overflow and arrange our weblog, podcast, and newsletter. The tweet is a line from the podcast that is later printed to be a total bluff, no longer a assertion of reality, and was supposed as a joke. But we did not present the sufficient context for folks to maintain that strive at humor in our tweet.
We endorse one tweet per week in enhance of the podcast, and this one was in uncomfortable taste. Upon being notified of the worries voiced in our community, we labored rapidly to delete the tweet and slay the paid promotion. We will strive to be more careful about how we phrase issues in the slay, as humor doesn’t constantly translate successfully online or on social media.
Can safe to you look for stuff in the slay that you just are eager shall be offensive or misunderstood, you would per chance well per chance elevate the problem here on Meta, or attain out to a CM who can contact me on Slack.